FOR A president of Britain's Royal Society, the world's oldest
scientific academy, to openly and angrily attack a President of the
United States is virtually unprecedented.
But Lord May's broadside against President Bush reflects the growing
anguish at the Bush administration's obstructionism, from scientists who
are concerned about the threat of climate change.
What America does - or does not do - has an enormous effect on
attempts to come to grips with global warming, because the
energy-profligate US, with 4 per cent of the world's population,
produces a quarter of the world's carbon dioxide. It is far and away the
biggest emitter of CO2 on earth.
So, in 2001, when Bush took America out of the Kyoto protocol, the
treaty prescribing initial cuts in CO2 emissions for the industrialised
countries, he did much more than give it a diplomatic body blow.
He invalidated the whole process, because as Lord May points out, the
uncut, increased emissions from the US between the start and finish of
the first Kyoto commitment period - 1990 to 2010 - will actually dwarf
the cuts by other parties.
The subtext to Lord May's speech is in effect: we might just as well
not have bothered.
Lord May's other concern is one widely shared on this side of the
Atlantic: the increasing attempts, filtering down from the top of the
administration, to deny the science of climate change. US climate
scientists are increasingly cautious about speaking on the issue,
fearful that their funding will be cut. The administration appears to
have decreed, in an Orwellian manner, that global warming Is Not
Happening.
This attitude has, weirdly, spread to Bush supporters among the
public. Even journalists in Britain who report on the science of climate
change receive e-mails from angry US citizens suggesting that - merely
because one reports such things - one is an effete European
cheese-eating surrender monkey.
Have a look at www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/005.htm
. It is chapter and verse - and it does not suggest that global warming
is a myth.